EUROSLA - the European Second Language Association

 

Abstract Evaluation Form

 

Evaluation Form EUROSLA 2011

 

Name of reviewer:

 

Please evaluate each abstract with regard to the degree in which it satisfies the following criteria (A-E) and give a total score using the scale (1-5) below:

Criteria

            A- discusses a current issue in the field of SLA

            B- presents evidence of theoretically motivated and original SLA research

            C- clearly states the problem and proposes a solution

            D- demonstrates that the chosen theoretical approach and research methodology adequately address the problem under                                  investigation

            E- points to broader theoretical implications.

                (please check the box if the paper fulfits the criterion)

Scale

            5- perfectly acceptable. The paper fully satisfies all criteria.

            4- rather acceptable. The paper fully satisfies some criteria and closly satisfies the others.

            3- satisfactory. The paper closely satisfies all criteria. It is adequate, but not preferential for inclusion in the conference.

            2- rather unacceptable. The paper partially satisfies some criteria, but does not satisfy the others.

            1- unacceptable. The paper does not satisfy any criteria. It should definitly be excluded.

                (please select from the top-down menu)

 

 

# of Abstract

Title of Abstract

A

B

C

D

E

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

Comments (if any):

 

 

 

 

 

 

EUROSLA  2007